Skip to content
World Health Systems Facts

Czech Republic: Wasteful Spending

Czech Republic: Wasteful Spending

Czech Republic Health System Overview
Health System Rankings
Health System Outcomes
Health System Coverage
Costs for Consumers
Health System Expenditures
Health System Financing
Czech Republic COVID-19 Policy

Health System Personnel
Health System Physical Resources and Utilization
Long-Term Care
Health Information and Communications Technologies
Medical Training
Pharmaceuticals
Wasteful Spending

Political System
Economic System
Population Demographics
People With Disabilities
Aging
Social Determinants & Health Equity
Health System History
Health System Challenges


“In an effort to contain costs, a system of user fees was introduced in 2008. These fees are intensely discussed by the Czech public and the exact design of the fee system is subject to constant changes (see sections 3.4.1 and 6.1). Additionally, in 2008 the administrative structure of the regional public health authorities was consolidated, with the aim of increased economic efficiency (see sections 2.3 and 5.1). In the late 1990s research started on introducing a DRG-based hospital payment system in the Czech Republic. Since 2007 case payments based on an adapted version of the AP-DRG system have accounted for an increasing share of total hospital revenue (estimates of 55–60% in 2013) (see section 3.7).”

Source: Alexa J, Rečka L, Votápková J, van Ginneken E, Spranger A, Wittenbecher F. Czech Republic: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 2015; 17(1):1–165.


“The future fiscal context of the Czech SHI [Social Health Insurance] system primarily depends on political decisions regarding an acceptable share of private expenditures. Despite the fact that the Czech Republic has one of the lowest shares of private health expenditures among OECD countries (OECD, 2013), it is unlikely that this share will rise in the short term due to lack of political consensus. To keep the current standard of health care, additional (financial) resources will thus have to be mobilized through other channels such as rising SHI contributions or more efficient delivery of care. If not, access may effectively be reduced because of increasing waiting times or limited availability of modern treatment options. The main political parties are aware of the necessity for reform. Yet they propose different solutions, ranging from more centralization with fewer or possibly only one health insurance fund on the left side of the political spectrum, to a more liberal and market-oriented approach on the right side of the political spectrum. The lack of consensus on a vision of the future Czech health system has prevented some key structural problems being addressed, such as mobilizing sufficient funds during economic downturns. This has led to recurring problems with financial instability, inefficiencies in care delivery, high transaction costs and an inability to benefit from reforms in the medium and long term.”

Source: Alexa J, Rečka L, Votápková J, van Ginneken E, Spranger A, Wittenbecher F. Czech Republic: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 2015; 17(1):1–165.


“Vaccination for some vulnerable groups of patients is covered by SHI [Social Health Insurance] (for example, vaccination against influenza for patients aged 65 years and over or for patients recovering from organ transplantation). In terms of financing, the vaccinations as well as the vaccines have been paid through SHI since 2010. This was a change from previous arrangements when the state paid for the vaccine through general taxation. It has added to the financial strain on health insurance funds as the additional responsibilities for vaccination were not matched by rising rates of health insurance premiums. Estimates suggest that this shift led to savings from the state budget of approximately CZK 850 million (€31.2 million) per year.”

Source: Alexa J, Rečka L, Votápková J, van Ginneken E, Spranger A, Wittenbecher F. Czech Republic: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 2015; 17(1):1–165.


“In the OECD Health Benefits Basket Questionnaire, 19 OECD countries reported systematic use of HTA [Health Technology Assessment] to decide whether a new medicine should be covered. Only nine countries did so for decisions regarding new medical procedures, and eight for new medical devices. Five countries reported systematic use of HTA to inform coverage for all technologies: Chile, France, Israel, Korea and Poland. Only a minority of countries, such as the Czech Republic, Japan and the United States, never or rarely use HTA as a formal part of decision making, but rather use HTA to determine reimbursement level or price-setting for new technologies (OECD, 2016b).”

Source: OECD (2017), Tackling Wasteful Spending on Health, OECD Publishing, Paris. dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266414-en


“Relatively high prices of pharmaceuticals and other medical supplies may reflect organisational structures of the procurement system that hinder building market power through bulk purchasing. For example, this occurs when small insurers or providers contract separately for limited volumes of the same products. Indeed, in many OECD countries, individual hospitals, pharmacies and local government units and insurers carry out procurement separately (e.g. Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sweden and Turkey). This not only precludes volume-related discounts but also creates unnecessary task repetition by each buyer.”

Source: OECD (2017), Tackling Wasteful Spending on Health, OECD Publishing, Paris. dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266414-en


“Health care systems in which coverage is provided by a single entity generally have lower administrative costs than multi-payer systems, partly because they enjoy more economies of scale (Mossialos et al., 2002). Enrolment, collection of contributions, claims processing, benefits management, sales and marketing, and insurance funds’ compliance with government and non-government regulations and accreditation need only a single accounting and processing system in single-payer schemes, whereas multi-payer systems by their nature multiply the same functions (Bentley et al., 2008). The same holds true for purchasing and contracting, which creates an additional burden at the provider level.

“Moreover, in multi-payer systems, costly and technically demanding risk-equalisation and resource transfer mechanisms are frequently required to counter issues of patient selection, ensure equal basic benefit packages, or indeed avoid budgetary difficulties of payers. Such systems exist, for instance, in Belgium, the Czech Republic, Germany, Japan, the Netherlands and Switzerland (Paris et al., 2010; van de Ven et al., 2013) but are not required in single-payer systems.”

Source: OECD (2017), Tackling Wasteful Spending on Health, OECD Publishing, Paris. dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266414-en


Health Systems Facts is a project of the Real Reporting Foundation. We provide reliable statistics and other data from authoritative sources regarding health systems in the US and sixteen other nations.


Page last updated Feb. 6, 2023 by Doug McVay, Editor.

  • Home
  • About Health Systems Facts
    • Contact Us
    • Join Our Email List
  • Breaking News & Opinion
  • Upcoming Events
  • Seventeen National Health Systems
    • Austria
    • Canada
    • Costa Rica
    • Czech Republic
    • Denmark
    • France
    • Germany
    • Hungary
    • Italy
    • Japan
    • Netherlands
    • South Korea
    • Spain
    • Sweden
    • Switzerland
    • United Kingdom
    • United States
  • Comparing National Health Systems
    • Healthcare Access and Quality Index
    • Sustainable Development Goals Health Index
    • Mirror Mirror 2021
    • World Health Report 2000
    • International Health Systems In Perspective
    • Lessons for US Health Reform
  • Aging
  • Health System Outcomes
  • Healthcare Spending
  • Healthcare Workers
    • Health System Personnel
    • Health Workforce Training
  • Information and Communications Technologies
  • Long-Term Services and Supports
  • People With Disabilities
  • Pharmaceutical Pricing and Regulation
  • Social Determinants & Health Equity
  • Wasteful Spending
  • Various US Health System Proposals
    • Affordable Care Act
    • All Payer
    • Public Option
    • Single Payer / “Medicare For All”
    • Universal Health Coverage
  • Recommended Resources
  • Privacy Policy
    • Cookie Policy
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

© 2019-2022 Real Reporting Foundation | Theme by WordPress Theme Detector

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
.
Cookie SettingsAccept
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
_GRECAPTCHA5 months 27 daysThis cookie is set by Google. In addition to certain standard Google cookies, reCAPTCHA sets a necessary cookie (_GRECAPTCHA) when executed for the purpose of providing its risk analysis.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-advertisement1 yearThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Advertisement".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
CookieDurationDescription
_ga2 yearsThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to calculate visitor, session, campaign data and keep track of site usage for the site's analytics report. The cookies store information anonymously and assign a randomly generated number to identify unique visitors.
_gat_UA-71314304-21 minuteThis is a pattern type cookie set by Google Analytics, where the pattern element on the name contains the unique identity number of the account or website it relates to. It appears to be a variation of the _gat cookie which is used to limit the amount of data recorded by Google on high traffic volume websites.
_gcl_au3 monthsThis cookie is used by Google Analytics to understand user interaction with the website.
_gid1 dayThis cookie is installed by Google Analytics. The cookie is used to store information of how visitors use a website and helps in creating an analytics report of how the website is doing. The data collected including the number visitors, the source where they have come from, and the pages visted in an anonymous form.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
CookieDurationDescription
IDE1 year 24 daysUsed by Google DoubleClick and stores information about how the user uses the website and any other advertisement before visiting the website. This is used to present users with ads that are relevant to them according to the user profile.
test_cookie15 minutesThis cookie is set by doubleclick.net. The purpose of the cookie is to determine if the user's browser supports cookies.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Powered by CookieYes Logo